Guoji Yanke Zazhi (Jun 2022)

Comparsion of corneal astigmatism measurement among iTrace, IOL Master 700 and Pentacam HR in cataract eyes

  • Shan Hua

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2022.6.30
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 6
pp. 1036 – 1039

Abstract

Read online

AIM: To investigate the difference and consistency among iTrace, IOL Master 700 and Pentacam HR in measuring corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery.METHODS: Across-sectional study. From May 2020 to May 2021, a total of 149 cataract patients(181 eyes)were collected in our hospital. Presurgery, steep keratometry(Ks), flat keratometry(Kf), mean keratometry(Km), astigmatism magnitude(Cyl), and steep astigmatic axis values measured by the three instruments of the iTrace, IOL Master 700 and the Pentacam HR. The difference and consistency of the measurement indexes of the three instruments were analyzed.RESULTS: Statistical differences existed in Ks, Kf, Km among the three instruments(F=4.912, 3.514, 4.873, all P0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed the outcomes revealed that the Ks and Kf measured by iTrace and the other two instruments have poor consistency, and the consistency of Cyl and Axis was good. But the difference of Axis is not clinically acceptable. There were no statistically differences between the iTrace and the other two devices among the low astigmatism(50 eyes), moderate astigmatism(34 eyes)and high astigmatism(18 eyes)groups(all P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In the preoperative measurement of cataract patients except for the good consistency of astigmatism, the iTrace, IOL Master 700 and Pentacam HR showed different Ks and Kf, and the Axis difference exceeded the clinically acceptable range, especially in the highly astigmatism group. The measurement of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery should be evaluated by multiple measurement methods and make comprehensive planning for the surgical plan.

Keywords