JOR Spine (Mar 2024)

Transcriptomic profiling reveals key early response genes during GDF6‐mediated differentiation of human adipose‐derived stem cells to nucleus pulposus cells

  • Hamish T. J. Gilbert,
  • Francis E. J. Wignall,
  • Leo Zeef,
  • Judith A. Hoyland,
  • Stephen M. Richardson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1315
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Stem cell‐based therapies show promise as a means of repairing the degenerate intervertebral disc, with growth factors often used alongside cells to help direct differentiation toward a nucleus pulposus (NP)‐like phenotype. We previously demonstrated adipose‐derived stem cell (ASC) differentiation with GDF6 as optimal for generating NP‐like cells through evaluating end‐stage differentiation parameters. Here we conducted a time‐resolved transcriptomic characterization of ASCs response to GDF6 stimulation to understand the early drivers of differentiation to NP‐like cells. Methods Human ASCs were treated with recombinant human GDF6 for 2, 6, and 12 h. RNA sequencing and detailed bioinformatic analysis were used to assess differential gene expression, gene ontology (GO), and transcription factor involvement during early differentiation. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to validate RNA sequencing findings and inhibitors used to interrogate Smad and Erk signaling pathways, as well as identify primary and secondary response genes. Results The transcriptomic response of ASCs to GDF6 stimulation was time‐resolved and highly structured, with “cell differentiation” “developmental processes,” and “response to stimulus” identified as key biological process GO terms. The transcription factor ERG1 was identified as a key early response gene. Temporal cluster analysis of differentiation genes identified positive regulation NP cell differentiation, as well as inhibition of osteogenesis and adipogenesis. A role for Smad and Erk signaling in the regulation of GDF6‐induced early gene expression response was observed and both primary and secondary response genes were identified. Conclusions This study identifies a multifactorial early gene response that contributes to lineage commitment, with the identification of a number of potentially useful early markers of differentiation of ASCs to NP cells. This detailed insight into the molecular processes in response to GDF6 stimulation of ASCs is important for the development of an efficient and efficacious cell‐based therapy for intervertebral disc degeneration‐associated back pain.

Keywords