Comparative Analysis of CREB3 and CREB3L2 Protein Expression in HEK293 Cells

Abstract

We performed a comparative analysis of two ER-resident CREB3 family proteins, CREB3 and CREB3L2, in HEK293 cells using pharmacological and genome editing approaches and identified several differences between the two. Treatment with brefeldin A (BFA) and monensin induced the cleavage of full-length CREB3 and CREB3L2; however, the level of the full-length CREB3 protein, but not CREB3L2 protein, was not noticeably reduced by the monensin treatment. On the other hand, treatment with tunicamycin (Tm) shifted the molecular weight of the full-length CREB3L2 protein downward but abolished CREB3 protein expression. Thapsigargin (Tg) significantly increased the expression of only full-length CREB3L2 protein concomitant with a slight increase in the level of its cleaved form. Treatment with cycloheximide and MG132 revealed that both endogenous CREB3 and CREB3L2 are proteasome substrates. In addition, kifunensine, an α-mannosidase inhibitor, significantly increased the levels of both full-length forms. Consistent with these findings, cells lacking SEL1L, a crucial ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD) component, showed increased expression of both full-length CREB3 and CREB3L2; however, cycloheximide treatment downregulated full-length CREB3L2 protein expression more rapidly in SEL1L-deficient cells than the full-length CREB3 protein. Finally, we investigated the induction of the expression of several CREB3 and CREB3L2 target genes by Tg and BFA treatments and SEL1L deficiency. In conclusion, this study suggests that both endogenous full-length CREB3 and CREB3L2 are substrates for ER-associated protein degradation but are partially regulated by distinct mechanisms, each of which contributes to unique cellular responses that are distinct from canonical ER signals.

Keywords

• CREB3
• CREB3L2
• ERAD
• SEL1L