PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Earlier relapse detection after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation by chimerism assays: Digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR of insertion/deletion polymorphisms.

  • Jennifer Valero-Garcia,
  • María Del Carmen González-Espinosa,
  • Manuel Barrios,
  • Greta Carmona-Antoñanzas,
  • Javier García-Planells,
  • Carlos Ruiz-Lafora,
  • Ainhoa Fuentes-Gálvez,
  • Antonio Jiménez-Velasco

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212708
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 2
p. e0212708

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe analysis of molecular haematopoietic chimerisms (HC) has become a well-established method to monitor the transplant evolution and to assess the risk of relapse after allogeneic stem cells transplantation (allo-STC). Different techniques and molecular markers are being used for chimerism surveillance after transplantation, including quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and the recently developed digital PCR (dPCR). This study aims to compare the sensitivity and accuracy of both methods to quantify HC and predict early relapse.MethodologyHC was evaluated using custom PCR systems for the specific detection of the Y-chromosome, null alleles and insertion-deletion polymorphisms. A total of 281 samples from 28 adult patients who underwent an allo-SCT were studied. Increasing mixed chimerism was detected prior to relapse in 100% of patients (18 relapses).ResultsCompared with conventional qPCR amplification, dPCR predicted relapse with a median anticipation period of 63 days versus 45.5 days by qPCR. Overall, 56% of the relapses were predicted earlier with dPCR whereas 38% of the relapses where detected simultaneously using both techniques and only in 1 case, relapse was predicted earlier with qPCR.ConclusionsIn conclusion, chimerism determination by dPCR constitutes a suitable technique for the follow-up of patients with haematological pathologies after allo-STC, showing greater sensitivity to predict an early relapse.