Cancer Reports (May 2024)

Is there any difference between Eastern and Western clinical practice guidelines in management of gastric cancer?

  • Amirmohsen Jalaeefar,
  • Seyedeh Zahra Mousavi,
  • Mohammad Shirkhoda,
  • Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh,
  • Narjes Mohammadzadeh,
  • Amirsina Sharifi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.2076
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 5
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background and Recent findings Gastric cancer (GC) has been known as one of the most common causes of cancer mortality both in Western and Eastern countries. However, there might be differences between how it is managed in different countries. Thus, we aimed to investigate these differences. Materials and Methods The most well‐known clinical guidelines in field of GC management including Korean GC Association (KGCA), Japanese GC Association (JGCA), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), and National Institute for health and Care Excellence (NICE) have been reviewed. Results The contents of these guidelines were categorized under eight headings including (1) genetic predisposition, (2) prevention, (3) management of gastric polyp, atrophy, dysplasia and metaplasia, (4) diagnosis, (5) pathology and molecular biology, (6) treatment, (7) supportive and palliative care, and (8) follow up. Difference in each section was discussed. Conclusion Considering KGCA and JGCA as Eastern and NCCN, ESMO, BSG, and NICE as Western guidelines, it is revealed that both sets of guidelines share common practices such as prioritizing comprehensive diagnostic evaluations, personalizing treatment plans, and palliative care. However, main differences can be seen in treatment regimens, the adoption of newer therapies like immunotherapy, and the utilization of emerging techniques such as HIPEC. These differences reflect the diverse clinical landscapes, research focuses, and healthcare systems within these regions.

Keywords