NeuroImage (May 2021)
The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 Tesla
- Maximilian N. Voelker,
- Oliver Kraff,
- Steffen Goerke,
- Frederik B. Laun,
- Jannis Hanspach,
- Kerrin J. Pine,
- Philipp Ehses,
- Moritz Zaiss,
- Andrzej Liebert,
- Sina Straub,
- Korbinian Eckstein,
- Simon Robinson,
- Armin N. Nagel,
- Maria R. Stefanescu,
- Astrid Wollrab,
- Sabrina Klix,
- Jörg Felder,
- Michael Hock,
- Dario Bosch,
- Nikolaus Weiskopf,
- Oliver Speck,
- Mark E. Ladd,
- Harald H. Quick
Affiliations
- Maximilian N. Voelker
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Corresponding author at: Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Oliver Kraff
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Steffen Goerke
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Frederik B. Laun
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Jannis Hanspach
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Kerrin J. Pine
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- Philipp Ehses
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Moritz Zaiss
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
- Andrzej Liebert
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Sina Straub
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Korbinian Eckstein
- High Field MR Center, Department for Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Simon Robinson
- High Field MR Center, Department for Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Armin N. Nagel
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Maria R. Stefanescu
- Chair of Cellular and Molecular Imaging, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center (CHFC), University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
- Astrid Wollrab
- Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Sabrina Klix
- Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin-Buch, Germany
- Jörg Felder
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Michael Hock
- Chair of Cellular and Molecular Imaging, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center (CHFC), University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
- Dario Bosch
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
- Nikolaus Weiskopf
- Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
- Oliver Speck
- Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany
- Mark E. Ladd
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Harald H. Quick
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 232
p. 117910
Abstract
Object: This study evaluates inter-site and intra-site reproducibility at ten different 7 T sites for quantitative brain imaging. Material and Methods: Two subjects – termed the “traveling heads” – were imaged at ten different 7 T sites with a harmonized quantitative brain MR imaging protocol. In conjunction with the system calibration, MP2RAGE, QSM, CEST and multi-parametric mapping/relaxometry were examined. Results: Quantitative measurements with MP2RAGE showed very high reproducibility across sites and subjects, and errors were in concordance with previous results and other field strengths. QSM had high inter-site reproducibility for relevant subcortical volumes. CEST imaging revealed systematic differences between the sites, but reproducibility was comparable to results in the literature. Relaxometry had also very high agreement between sites, but due to the high sensitivity, differences caused by different applications of the B1 calibration of the two RF coil types used were observed. Conclusion: Our results show that quantitative brain imaging can be performed with high reproducibility at 7 T and with similar reliability as found at 3 T for multicenter studies of the supratentorial brain.