Diagnostics (Mar 2017)

Symptoms Relevant to Surveillance for Ovarian Cancer

  • Robert M. Ore,
  • Lauren Baldwin,
  • Dylan Woolum,
  • Erika Elliott,
  • Christiaan Wijers,
  • Chieh-Yu Chen,
  • Rachel W. Miller,
  • Christopher P. DeSimone,
  • Frederick R. Ueland,
  • Richard J. Kryscio,
  • John R. van Nagell,
  • Edward J. Pavlik

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics7010018
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
p. 18

Abstract

Read online

To examine how frequently and confidently healthy women report symptoms during surveillance for ovarian cancer. A symptoms questionnaire was administered to 24,526 women over multiple visits accounting for 70,734 reports. A query of reported confidence was included as a confidence score (CS). Chi square, McNemars test, ANOVA and multivariate analyses were performed. 17,623 women completed the symptoms questionnaire more than one time and >9500 women completed it more than one four times for >43,000 serially completed questionnaires. Reporting ovarian cancer symptoms was ~245 higher than ovarian cancer incidence. The positive predictive value (0.073%) for identifying ovarian cancer based on symptoms alone would predict one malignancy for 1368 cases taken to surgery due to reported symptoms. Confidence on the first questionnaire (83.3%) decreased to 74% when more than five questionnaires were completed. Age-related decreases in confidence were significant (p < 0.0001). Women reporting at least one symptom expressed more confidence (41,984/52,379 = 80.2%) than women reporting no symptoms (11,882/18,355 = 64.7%), p < 0.0001. Confidence was unrelated to history of hormone replacement therapy or abnormal ultrasound findings (p = 0.30 and 0.89). The frequency of symptoms relevant to ovarian cancer was much higher than the occurrence of ovarian cancer. Approximately 80.1% of women expressed confidence in what they reported.

Keywords