Asian Journal of Surgery (Apr 2013)

Differences in accuracy and underestimation rates for 14- versus 16-gauge core needle biopsies in ultrasound-detectable breast lesions

  • Hung-Wen Lai,
  • Hwa-Koon Wu,
  • Shou-Jen Kuo,
  • Shou-Tung Chen,
  • Hsin-Shun Tseng,
  • Ling-Ming Tseng,
  • Dar-Ren Chen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.09.003
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 36, no. 2
pp. 83 – 88

Abstract

Read online

Background/Objective: Core needle biopsy (CNB) was widely used in the diagnosis of ultrasound-detectable breast lesions. We aimed at assessing the diagnostic performance differences between 14- and 16-gauge ultrasound-guided core biopsies. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients receiving CNB from January 2001 to December 2007. The results of 14- and 16-gauge breast CNBs were compared with pathology reports of open surgical biopsy (OSB). Results: A total of 1024 paired CNB and OSB results were obtained from 1732 CNB procedures in 1630 patients.Those CNB results reached 92.9% sensitivity, 99.7% specificity, 5.96% underestimation, and 94.8% accuracy rates. There was no difference in sensitivity (p = 0.17) or specificity (p = 0.38) between 14- and 16-gauge needles. However, better overall accuracy (p = 0.02), less underestimation (p < 0.001), and lower false-negative (p = 0.02) rates were found for the 14-gauge CNB. Conclusion: Regarding accuracy and underestimation rates, a 14-gauge needle is preferred to a 16-gauge one in ultrasound-guided biopsies.

Keywords