Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications (Sep 2019)

Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and DFT studies of 5-bromo-1-{2-[2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl}indoline-2,3-dione

  • Omar Abdellaoui,
  • Tuncer Hökelek,
  • Frédéric Capet,
  • Catherine Renard,
  • Amal Haoudi,
  • Mohamed Khalid Skalli,
  • Youssef Kandri Rodi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019011617
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 75, no. 9
pp. 1372 – 1378

Abstract

Read online

The title compound, C14H15BrClNO4, consists of a 5-bromoindoline-2,3-dione unit linked to a 1-{2-[2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl} moiety. In the crystal, a series of C—H...O hydrogen bonds link the molecules to form a supramolecular three-dimensional structure, enclosing R22(8), R22(12), R22(18) and R22(22) ring motifs. π–π contacts between the five-membered dione rings may further stabilize the structure, with a centroid–centroid distance of 3.899 (2) Å. The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H...H (28.1%), H...O/O...H (23.5%), H...Br/Br...H (13.8%), H...Cl/Cl...H (13.0%) and H...C/C...H (10.2%) interactions. Hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interactions are the dominant interactions in the crystal packing. Density functional theory (DFT) optimized structures at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level are compared with the experimentally determined molecular structure in the solid state. The HOMO—LUMO behaviour was elucidated to determine the energy gap. The chloroethoxyethoxyethyl side chain atoms are disordered over two sets of sites with an occupancy ratio of 0.665 (8):0.335 (6).

Keywords