Frontiers in Oncology (Sep 2024)

A phase III study to access the safety and efficacy of prolgolimab 250 mg fixed dose administered every 3 weeks versus prolgolimab 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks in patients with metastatic melanoma (FLAT)

  • Lev Demidov,
  • Galina Kharkevich,
  • Natalia Petenko,
  • Vladimir Moiseenko,
  • Svetlana Protsenko,
  • Tatiana Semiglazova,
  • Anastasia Zimina,
  • Nadezhda Kovalenko,
  • Natalia Fadeeva,
  • Dmitry Kirtbaya,
  • Igor Belogortsev,
  • Denis Tantsyrev,
  • Svetlana Odintsova,
  • Alfia Nesterova,
  • Karina Vorontsova,
  • Yulia Makarycheva,
  • Yulia Linkova,
  • Arina Zinkina-Orikhan,
  • Anna Siliutina,
  • Irina Sorokina,
  • Irina Sorokina,
  • Daria Liaptseva,
  • Vladimir Chistyakov,
  • Anton Lutsky

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1385685
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundProlgolimab is the first Russian PD-1 inhibitor approved for the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma and advanced non-small cell lung cancer. It was approved in two weight-based regimens of 1 mg/kg Q2W and 3 mg/kg Q3W, but because of re-evaluation of weight-based dosing paradigm, studying of a fixed-dose regimen was considered perspective.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, single-arm, open-label efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety study to obtain data that would allow the approval of the new flat dosing regimen of prolgolimab in patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma (BCD-100-8/FLAT, NCT05783882). The primary objective was to prove the non-inferiority of prolgolimab 250 mg Q3W versus prolgolimab 1 mg/kg Q2W for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma in terms of ORR according to RECIST 1.1. Patients from the MIRACULUM study (BCD-100-2/MIRACULUM, NCT03269565) comprised a historical control group.ResultsOne hundred fourteen patients received prolgolimab 250 mg Q3W, and 61 patients received prolgolimab (Prolgo) 1 mg/kg Q2W (historical control). Objective response was achieved by 33.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 24.8, 42.8] of patients in the Prolgo 250 mg group compared with 32.8% (95% CI: 21.3, 46.0) of patients in the Prolgo 1 mg/kg group. Risk difference was 0.00, 95% CI (−0.12; NA), p = 0.0082. Both regimens were well tolerated, and safety profiles were comparable. The pharmacokinetic analysis (PK) showed that the regimen with the fixed dose of 250 mg Q3W was characterized by higher PK parameters. The immunogenicity study did not detect binding antibodies to prolgolimab in any of the subjects.ConclusionThe obtained results showed that the selected fixed dosing regimen of prolgolimab 250 mg Q3W is characterized by efficacy and safety parameters comparable to that observed for the 1 mg/kg Q2W regimen.

Keywords