PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Potential biomarkers of major depression diagnosis and chronicity.

  • Ana Cecília de Menezes Galvão,
  • Raíssa Nobrega Almeida,
  • Geovan Menezes de Sousa Júnior,
  • Mário André Leocadio-Miguel,
  • Fernanda Palhano-Fontes,
  • Dráulio Barros de Araujo,
  • Bruno Lobão-Soares,
  • João Paulo Maia-de-Oliveira,
  • Emerson Arcoverde Nunes,
  • Jaime Eduardo Cecilio Hallak,
  • Jerome Sarris,
  • Nicole Leite Galvão-Coelho

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257251
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 9
p. e0257251

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundMolecular biomarkers are promising tools to be routinely used in clinical psychiatry. Among psychiatric diseases, major depression disorder (MDD) has gotten attention due to its growing prevalence and morbidity.MethodsWe tested some peripheral molecular parameters such as serum mature Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (mBDNF), plasma C-Reactive Protein (CRP), serum cortisol (SC), and the salivary Cortisol Awakening Response (CAR), as well as the Pittsburgh sleep quality inventory (PSQI), as part of a multibiomarker panel for potential use in MDD diagnosis and evaluation of disease's chronicity using regression models, and ROC curve.ResultsFor diagnosis model, two groups were analyzed: patients in the first episode of major depression (MD: n = 30) and a healthy control (CG: n = 32). None of those diagnosis models tested had greater power than Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-6. For MDD chronicity, a group of patients with treatment-resistant major depression (TRD: n = 28) was tested across the MD group. The best chronicity model (p ConclusionThese results indicate that changes in specific biomarkers (CAR, SC, mBDNF and PSQI) have potential on the evaluation of MDD chronicity, but not for its diagnosis. Therefore, these findings can contribute for further studies aiming the development of a stronger model to be commercially available and used in psychiatry clinical practice.