Coluna/Columna (Mar 2023)

EVALUATION OF KYPHOSIS MEASUREMENT IN THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES

  • Vitor Regatieri Casagrande,
  • Leonardo Ribeiro Nascimento,
  • Vinicius Nogueira Toledo,
  • Pedro Fellipe Deborto Rudine Remolli Evangelista,
  • Robson Cruz de Oliveira,
  • Herton Rodrigo Tavares Costa,
  • Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222201262409
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1

Abstract

Read online Read online

ABSTRACT Objectives: Evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of the kyphosis measurement in thoracolumbar spine traumatic fractures by different assessment methods in different types of fractures. Methods: Fifteen fractures of the thoracolumbar spine, previously classified into types A, B, and C according to Magerl’s classification, were evaluated. The value of kyphosis was measured using five different methods: (1) Cobb angle; (2) Gardner’s method; (3) back wall method; (4) angle of adjacent endplates; and (5) wedge angle. The measurements were performed by five independent observers and repeated five times with a minimum interval of two weeks between each evaluation. Results: Intraobserver reliability was excellent among the five observers, evidencing good reproducibility of the methods. The five methods used also showed great intraobserver reliability in the global analysis, with methods one and four being more consistent. Conclusion: Although there is no universal agreement on measuring kyphosis in thoracolumbar fractures, our study concluded that method 1 (Cobb angle) and method 4 (adjacent endplate angle) presented the best interobserver reliabilities. Furthermore, the use of digitized radiographs and a simple computer program allowed the performance of highly reliable and reproducible measurements by all methods, given the high intraobserver reliability. Level of Evidence II; Comparative study.

Keywords