TRANSFORM-HF Trial: Choice of loop diuretic in acute heart failure does not matter!

Abstract

The major clinical manifestations of heart failure (HF) are due to fluid retention and congestion, and thus, therapy targeting congestion plays a central role in HF management. Furosemide is by far the most commonly prescribed loop diuretic. However, data primarily derived from observational and small randomized trials point toward potential advantages with torsemide use including improvement in functional status, survival, and hospitalization for HF. The TRANSFORM-HF study aimed to answer a pragmatic query faced by physicians managing HF – Does the choice of loop diuretic matter in HF? There was no benefit of torsemide over furosemide in this large study of >2800 patients for mortality, hospitalization, and quality of life. Though, there were a few shortcomings of the study, the results are in sync with current HF guidelines which do not advocate the use of one loop diuretic or other. Hence, the focus in acute HF should be on optimizing the diuretic dose and other guideline-based therapies rather than the type of diuretics. Recent trials of acetazolamide and other diuretics have shown benefits when used in conjunction with loop diuretics. Since the primary care physician is often the first point of medical contact, the manuscript aims to provide insights into their practice. The message is clear that in acute heart failure, there is no benefit of choosing the type of loop diuretic and impetus should be on adding other class diuretics if needed as well as initiating other guideline-directed medical therapies.

Keywords

• advor
• congestion
• furosemide
• mortality
• weight loss