Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine (Feb 2020)

Multi‐institutional experience of genetic diagnosis in Ecuador: National registry of chromosome alterations and polymorphisms

  • César Paz‐y‐Miño,
  • Verónica Yumiceba,
  • Germania Moreta,
  • Rosario Paredes,
  • Mónica Ruiz,
  • Ligia Ocampo,
  • Arianne Llamos Paneque,
  • Catalina Ochoa Pérez,
  • Juan Carlos Ruiz‐Cabezas,
  • Jenny Álvarez Vidal,
  • Idarmis Jiménez Torres,
  • Ramón Vargas‐Vera,
  • Fernando Cruz,
  • Víctor Hugo Guapi N,
  • Martha Montalván,
  • Sara Meneses Álvarez,
  • Maribel Garzón Castro,
  • Elizabeth Lamar Segura,
  • María Augusta Recalde Báez,
  • María Elena Naranjo,
  • Nina Tambaco Jijón,
  • María Sinche,
  • Pedro Licuy,
  • Ramiro Burgos,
  • Fabián Porras‐Borja,
  • Gabriela Echeverría‐Garcés,
  • Andy Pérez‐Villa,
  • Isaac Armendáriz‐Castillo,
  • Jennyfer M. García‐Cárdenas,
  • Santiago Guerrero,
  • Patricia Guevara‐Ramírez,
  • Andrés López‐Cortés,
  • Ana Karina Zambrano,
  • Paola E. Leone

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1087
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 2
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Detection of chromosomal abnormalities is crucial in various medical areas; to diagnose birth defects, genetic disorders, and infertility, among other complex phenotypes, in individuals across a wide range of ages. Hence, the present study wants to contribute to the knowledge of type and frequency of chromosomal alterations and polymorphisms in Ecuador. Methods Cytogenetic registers from different Ecuadorian provinces have been merged and analyzed to construct an open‐access national registry of chromosome alterations and polymorphisms. Results Of 28,806 karyotypes analyzed, 6,008 (20.9%) exhibited alterations. Down syndrome was the most frequent autosome alteration (88.28%), followed by Turner syndrome (60.50%), a gonosome aneuploidy. A recurrent high percentage of Down syndrome mosaicism (7.45%) reported here, as well as by previous Ecuadorian preliminary registries, could be associated with geographic location and admixed ancestral composition. Translocations (2.46%) and polymorphisms (7.84%) were not as numerous as autosomopathies (64.33%) and gonosomopathies (25.37%). Complementary to conventional cytogenetics tests, molecular tools have allowed identification of submicroscopic alterations regions or candidate genes which can be possibly implicated in patients' symptoms and phenotypes. Conclusion The Ecuadorian National Registry of Chromosome Alterations and Polymorphisms provides a baseline to better understand chromosomal abnormalities in Ecuador and therefore their clinical management and awareness. This data will guide public policy makers to promote and financially support cytogenetic and genetic testing.

Keywords