Fertility & Reproduction (Sep 2024)

Live Motile Sperm Sorting Device Improves Embryo Aneuploidy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Ketevan Gotsiridze,
  • Nana Menabde,
  • Mariam Makhniashvili,
  • Tamar Jokhadze

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/S2661318224500166
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 06, no. 03
pp. 117 – 122

Abstract

Read online

Background: Conventional sperm selection methods, involving centrifugation, exert a detrimental effect on sperm DNA integrity due to mechanical stress. The recent noninvasive sperm selection device, CA0, based on live sperm sorting technology, facilitates the retrieval of highly motile sperm and minimizes sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF). This study was to investigate the impact of various sperm separation methods, with and without centrifugation, on embryo ploidy status. Methods: The retrospective study comprised 82 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles involving preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cases, with a focus on recruiting egg donation cycles to thoroughly investigate the impact of male factors. Two populations are classified based on semen quality: normozoospermic ([Formula: see text] = 33) and non-normozoospermic ([Formula: see text] = 49). Subjects were allocated to either swim-up (SU) or CA0. Preimplantation genetic testing results were recorded. Results: When comparing male characteristics between subgroups, no significant differences were observed except for a lower normal morphology rate in the CA0 group compared to SU (SU: 3 [3–4] vs. CA0: 2 [2–2.8], [Formula: see text] < 0.0001) in the non-normozoospermic cohort. There were no differences in female factors such as age and mature oocyte count (MII) number between subgroups, indicating that this model is ideal for assessing the impact of male factors on clinical outcomes. In the normozoospermic cohort, euploidy rates were similar between SU and CA0 (SU: 71.9% vs. CA0: 64.2%). However, in the non-normozoospermic cohort, CA0 showed a significantly higher euploidy rate compared to SU (SU: 53.6% vs. CA0: 74.2%) and a lower aneuploidy rate (SU: 37.1% vs. CA0: 25.8%). Additionally, CA0 minimized the incidence of mosaic embryos, whereas a mosaicism rate of 9.3% was observed with SU. This trend highlights CA0’s distinct advantage in optimizing outcomes for non-normozoospermic cases. Conclusions: CA0 is a reliable intervention to optimize paternal genetic quality before assisted insemination, thereafter effectively reducing the incidence of embryo aneuploidy associated with male factors.

Keywords