Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research (May 2023)

Amniotic fluid karyotype analysis and prenatal diagnosis strategy of 3117 pregnant women with amniocentesis indication

  • Yi Liu,
  • Xue-Cheng Sun,
  • Guo-Jian Lv,
  • Ji-Hong Liu,
  • Chen Sun,
  • Kai Mu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2022-0168
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 6

Abstract

Read online

Aim: To examine prenatal diagnosis strategies through fetal karyotype analysis for 3117 pregnant women with genetic amniocentesis indications. Materials & methods: According to the different indications for amniocentesis, the study was divided into 8 groups. The number of amniocentesis specimens, the number of abnormal karyotypes and the positive rate of each group were analyzed. Results: Compared with prenatal serum screening, noninvasive prenatal DNA testing is more accurate and can effectively improve screening efficiency.Multiple prenatal diagnosis indicators (37.349%) were more likely to be detected than single prenatal diagnosis indicators (11.091%). Conclusion: None of the screeningmethods can completely replace amniocentesis, and for pregnant womenwith genetic indications for amniocentesis, amniocentesis is strongly recommended.

Keywords