A Comparison among Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Multi-Institutional Study

Abstract

The comparison of clinical effectiveness and safety across different nonvitamin K antagonist direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in Asian patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unclear. Therefore, we assessed the real-world benefits of different DOACs in these patients. A cohort of 1480 patients with VTE were identified from the Chang Gung Research Database between 1 January 2012, and 31 December 2019. The composite outcomes of recurrent VTE and major bleeding were evaluated for four DOACs. The composite outcomes of recurrent VTE and major bleeding occurred in 9.06%, 9.80%, 8.61%, and 10.86% of the apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban groups, respectively, within 12 months of treatment initiation. The risk of the composite outcomes was similar in the rivaroxaban group and the apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban groups, with a subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.49–1.29), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.34–1.95), and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.42–1.39), respectively. No significant differences in the rates of recurrent VTE or major bleeding were observed between the rivaroxaban and other DOAC groups at the 12-month follow-up. According to real-world practice in Asian patients with VTE, the DOAC type was not associated with the differences in the risk of recurrent VTE or major bleeding within 12 months of treatment initiation.

Keywords

• pulmonary embolism
• deep vein thrombosis
• anticoagulation
• bleeding
• venous thromboembolism