BMC Medical Education (Nov 2010)

Rarely selected distractors in high stakes medical multiple-choice examinations and their recognition by item authors: a simulation and survey

  • Krebs René,
  • Hofer Rainer,
  • Rogausch Anja

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-85
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
p. 85

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Many medical exams use 5 options for multiple choice questions (MCQs), although the literature suggests that 3 options are optimal. Previous studies on this topic have often been based on non-medical examinations, so we sought to analyse rarely selected, 'non-functional' distractors (NF-D) in high stakes medical examinations, and their detection by item authors as well as psychometric changes resulting from a reduction in the number of options. Methods Based on Swiss Federal MCQ examinations from 2005-2007, the frequency of NF-D (selected by Results About 70% of the 5-option-items had at least 1 NF-D selected by Conclusions Based on item statistics and/or an expert panel's recommendation, the choice of a varying number of 3-4 (or partly 2) plausible distractors could be performed without marked deteriorations in psychometric characteristics.