Frontiers in Marine Science (Aug 2019)

Polar Ocean Observations: A Critical Gap in the Observing System and Its Effect on Environmental Predictions From Hours to a Season

  • Gregory C. Smith,
  • Richard Allard,
  • Marcel Babin,
  • Laurent Bertino,
  • Matthieu Chevallier,
  • Matthieu Chevallier,
  • Gary Corlett,
  • Julia Crout,
  • Fraser Davidson,
  • Bruno Delille,
  • Sarah T. Gille,
  • David Hebert,
  • Patrick Hyder,
  • Janet Intrieri,
  • José Lagunas,
  • Gilles Larnicol,
  • Thomas Kaminski,
  • Belinda Kater,
  • Frank Kauker,
  • Frank Kauker,
  • Claudie Marec,
  • Claudie Marec,
  • Matthew Mazloff,
  • E. Joseph Metzger,
  • Calvin Mordy,
  • Anne O’Carroll,
  • Steffen M. Olsen,
  • Michael Phelps,
  • Pamela Posey,
  • Pierre Prandi,
  • Eric Rehm,
  • Phillip Reid,
  • Ignatius Rigor,
  • Stein Sandven,
  • Matthew Shupe,
  • Matthew Shupe,
  • Sebastiaan Swart,
  • Sebastiaan Swart,
  • Ole Martin Smedstad,
  • Amy Solomon,
  • Andrea Storto,
  • Pierre Thibaut,
  • John Toole,
  • Kevin Wood,
  • Jiping Xie,
  • Qinghua Yang,
  • the WWRP PPP Steering Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00429
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6

Abstract

Read online

There is a growing need for operational oceanographic predictions in both the Arctic and Antarctic polar regions. In the former, this is driven by a declining ice cover accompanied by an increase in maritime traffic and exploitation of marine resources. Oceanographic predictions in the Antarctic are also important, both to support Antarctic operations and also to help elucidate processes governing sea ice and ice shelf stability. However, a significant gap exists in the ocean observing system in polar regions, compared to most areas of the global ocean, hindering the reliability of ocean and sea ice forecasts. This gap can also be seen from the spread in ocean and sea ice reanalyses for polar regions which provide an estimate of their uncertainty. The reduced reliability of polar predictions may affect the quality of various applications including search and rescue, coupling with numerical weather and seasonal predictions, historical reconstructions (reanalysis), aquaculture and environmental management including environmental emergency response. Here, we outline the status of existing near-real time ocean observational efforts in polar regions, discuss gaps, and explore perspectives for the future. Specific recommendations include a renewed call for open access to data, especially real-time data, as a critical capability for improved sea ice and weather forecasting and other environmental prediction needs. Dedicated efforts are also needed to make use of additional observations made as part of the Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP; 2017–2019) to inform optimal observing system design. To provide a polar extension to the Argo network, it is recommended that a network of ice-borne sea ice and upper-ocean observing buoys be deployed and supported operationally in ice-covered areas together with autonomous profiling floats and gliders (potentially with ice detection capability) in seasonally ice covered seas. Finally, additional efforts to better measure and parameterize surface exchanges in polar regions are much needed to improve coupled environmental prediction.

Keywords