Heliyon (Aug 2024)

The relationship between humeral head angulation and bone void within the humeral head in proximal humerus fractures

  • Jiabao Ju,
  • Yongwen Zhou,
  • Liang Chen,
  • Mingtai Ma,
  • Yichong Zhang,
  • Zhentao Ding,
  • Renbin Li,
  • Jianhai Chen

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 16
p. e36145

Abstract

Read online

Background: The variability of humeral head angulation in proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) is a noteworthy observation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential association between humeral head angulation and bone void within the humeral head in PHFs. Methods: We used the reconstruction function in Mimics software to generate three-dimensional models of fractures. Bony landmarks were employed to accurately define the calcar and humeral head zone. Boolean subtraction was performed to calculate the volume of head bone void. Results: The cohort consisted of 60 (74.1 %) varus, 21 (25.9 %) valgus, and 23 (22.1 %) neutral angulated PHFs. The mean percentage of humeral head bone void was 38.5 ± 17.8 in varus, 36.3 ± 15.7 in valgus, and 30.1 ± 10.6 in neutral angulated PHFs. A significant difference was observed between the varus and neutral groups (P = 0.035). In addition, an analysis of humeral head bone void was conducted among patients aged over 65 years old, revealing a mean percentage of 42.7 ± 16.4 in varus (27 cases), 34.8 ± 14.5 in valgus (13 cases), and 28.1 ± 11.8 in neutral (8 cases) angulated PHFs. The difference between the varus and neutral groups was also significant (P = 0.023). Conclusion: All types of angulation patterns exhibited humeral head bone void to some extent, with the varus-displaced PHFs demonstrating more obvious defects in comparison to the neutral angulated type.

Keywords