JCO Global Oncology (Apr 2024)

Uptake of Risk-Reducing Measures, Cascade Testing, and Related Challenges Among Carriers of Breast Cancer–Associated Germline Pathogenic Variants in Mexico

  • Fernanda Mesa-Chavez,
  • Yanin Chavarri-Guerra,
  • Dione Aguilar-y-Mendez,
  • Andrea Becerril-Gaitan,
  • Bryan F. Vaca-Cartagena,
  • Araceli Carrillo-Bedoya,
  • Salvador Santiesteban-González,
  • Alejandro Aranda-Gutierrez,
  • Andrés Rodríguez-Faure,
  • Daniela Obregon-Leal,
  • Gregorio Quintero-Beuló,
  • Jose L. Rodriguez-Olivares,
  • Melina Miaja,
  • Jeffrey N. Weitzel,
  • Cynthia Villarreal-Garza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.23.00417
Journal volume & issue
no. 10

Abstract

Read online

PURPOSEGenetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) provides pathogenic variant (PV) carriers with the invaluable opportunity to undertake timely cancer risk-reducing (RR) measures and initiate cascade testing (CT). This study describes the uptake of these strategies and the related barriers among breast cancer–associated germline PV carriers in Mexico.METHODSCarriers who were at least 6 months after disclosure of genetic test results at two GCRA referral centers were invited to answer a survey assessing sociodemographic characteristics, awareness of their carrier status and its implications, uptake of RR measures according to international guidelines by PV, CT initiation, and associated challenges.RESULTSOf the eligible carriers, 246/384 (64%) answered the survey (median age: 44 years). Most were female (88%), married/in domestic partnership (66%), and had personal breast/ovarian cancer history (61%). PVs included BRCA1/2 (75%), CHEK2 (10%), PALB2 (5%), ATM (5%), NF1 (2%), RAD51C (2%), PTEN (1%), and TP53 (1%). Most (87%) participants were aware of their carrier status. When recommended, 37% underwent RR bilateral mastectomy, 48% RR oophorectomy, 70% annual mammogram, and 20% breast magnetic resonance imaging. Challenges hindering the uptake of RR measures included financial limitations (67%), lack of recommendation by their physician (35%), and fear (24%). Nearly all (98%) claimed sharing their results with their relatives. CT was initiated in 63% of families and was associated with carriers being married/in domestic partnership (P = .04) and believing GCRA was useful (P < .001).CONCLUSIONDespite the resource-constrained setting, relevant rates of RR measures and CT were observed. Targeted interventions to reduce out-of-pocket expenses and improve patient-physician communication and patients' understanding on carrier status are warranted to enhance the overall benefit of GCRA and ultimately improve the provision of patient-centered care to both carriers and their at-risk relatives.