Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics (Jun 2017)

Patients’ Expectations from Foot and Ankle Surgery

  • Elizabeth Cody MD,
  • Carol Mancuso MD,
  • Jayme Burket PhD,
  • Anca Marinescu BA,
  • Aoife MacMahon BA,
  • Constantine Demetracopoulos MD,
  • David Levine MD,
  • Jonathan Deland MD,
  • Mark Drakos MD,
  • Matthew Roberts MD,
  • Scott Ellis MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011417S000007
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2

Abstract

Read online

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: Few authors have investigated patients’ expectations from foot and ankle surgery, and standardized means of assessing expectations are lacking. Managing patients’ preoperative expectations may help improve their ultimate satisfaction with surgery. In a previous study (in press), we developed a valid and reliable patient-derived expectations survey for patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. In this study, we aimed to examine relationships between patients’ preoperative expectations and their demographic and clinical characteristics. We hypothesized that patients with more disability and those with anxiety or depressive symptoms would have greater expectations. Methods: All adult patients scheduled for elective foot or ankle surgery by one of six orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons were screened for inclusion over eight months. Preoperatively, patients completed the Foot & Ankle Surgery Expectations Survey in addition to the Foot & Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Short Form (SF)-12, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), and pain visual analog scale (VAS). The expectations survey contains 23 expectations categories, each with five answer choices ranging from I do not have this expectation to complete improvement expected. It is scored from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater expectations. Differences in expectations score with categorical variables were assessed with t-tests and single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences in number of expectations and number of expectations with complete improvement expected were assessed with Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests. Relationships between expectations and continuous variables were assessed with linear regression. Results: 352 patients (average age 55 ± 15, range 18 to 86) were enrolled. Expectations were not significantly related to age. Women expected to achieve complete improvement more often than men (p = 0.011). Other factors significantly associated with higher expectations (p < 0.05) included non-Caucasian race, workers’ compensation, use of a cane or other assistive device, diagnosis of ankle instability or osteochondral lesion, and greater medical comorbidity (Table). Patients with a history of prior orthopaedic surgery were less likely to expect complete improvement. Worse function and quality of life (as assessed by all FAOS subscales and SF-12 physical and mental components), more depressive and anxiety symptoms, and higher pain VAS scores were associated with higher expectations scores and more expectations (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusion: The results of this study may help inform surgeons’ preoperative discussions with their patients regarding realistic expectations from surgery. Generally patients with worse function and more disability had higher expectations from surgery. Addressing these patients’ expectations preoperatively may help improve their ultimate satisfaction with surgery.