BMC Cardiovascular Disorders (Oct 2021)

Difference in left atrial D-dimer level in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulant

  • Tetsuya Watanabe,
  • Koichi Tachibana,
  • Yukinori Shinoda,
  • Tomoko Minamisaka,
  • Hidetada Fukuoka,
  • Hirooki Inui,
  • Keisuke Ueno,
  • Souki Inoue,
  • Kentaro Mine,
  • Shiro Hoshida

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02285-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) may cause cerebral and systemic embolism. An increased D-dimer level indicates hyperactivation of secondary fibrinolysis, resulting in predilection for thrombosis. To clarify the differential effects of anticoagulation therapy, we compared the D-dimer levels in peripheral and left atrial (LA) blood of atrial fibrillation patients scheduled for ablation. Methods We analyzed 141 patients with non-valvular AF (dabigatran, n = 30; apixaban, n = 47; edoxaban, n = 64; mean age: 68 years, male: 60%). Peripheral venous blood and LA blood was collected before pulmonary vein isolation. We examined the laboratory and echocardiographic parameters. Results After adjusting for baseline characteristics, D-dimer level in the LA was significantly higher in patients treated with edoxaban than that in those on apixaban (0.77 ± 0.05 vs. 0.60 ± 0.05 μg/mL, P = 0.047), although there were no significant differences in peripheral D-dimer levels. We classified the D-dimer value of the LA into a normal group (< 0.9) and a high value group (≥ 1.0); the peripheral prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 level (odds ratio [OR] 1.012; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003–1.022; P = 0.008) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR, 0.947; 95% CI, 0.910–0.986; P = 0.008) were potential predictors of high LA D-dimer levels. Conclusions In apixaban-treated patients, the D-dimer level in the left atrium was lower than in edoxaban-treated patients on the day of ablation, suggesting that the anticoagulant effect of apixaban on the left atrium is better than that of edoxaban in patients with AF.

Keywords