Frontiers in Neurology (Jun 2021)

Early Effects of Passive Leg-Raising Test, Fluid Challenge, and Norepinephrine on Cerebral Autoregulation and Oxygenation in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients

  • Chiara Robba,
  • Chiara Robba,
  • Antonio Messina,
  • Antonio Messina,
  • Denise Battaglini,
  • Lorenzo Ball,
  • Lorenzo Ball,
  • Iole Brunetti,
  • Matteo Bassetti,
  • Matteo Bassetti,
  • Daniele R. Giacobbe,
  • Daniele R. Giacobbe,
  • Antonio Vena,
  • Nicolo' Patroniti,
  • Nicolo' Patroniti,
  • Maurizio Cecconi,
  • Maurizio Cecconi,
  • Basil F. Matta,
  • Xiuyun Liu,
  • Patricia R. M. Rocco,
  • Marek Czosnyka,
  • Paolo Pelosi,
  • Paolo Pelosi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.674466
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients are at high risk of neurological complications consequent to several factors including persistent hypotension. There is a paucity of data on the effects of therapeutic interventions designed to optimize systemic hemodynamics on cerebral autoregulation (CA) in this group of patients.Methods: Single-center, observational prospective study conducted at San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Genoa, Italy, from October 1 to December 15, 2020. Mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, who had at least one episode of hypotension and received a passive leg raising (PLR) test, were included. They were then treated with fluid challenge (FC) and/or norepinephrine (NE), according to patients' clinical conditions, at different moments. The primary outcome was to assess the early effects of PLR test and of FC and NE [when clinically indicated to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure (MAP)] on CA (CA index) measured by transcranial Doppler (TCD). Secondary outcomes were to evaluate the effects of PLR test, FC, and NE on systemic hemodynamic variables, cerebral oxygenation (rSo2), and non-invasive intracranial pressure (nICP).Results: Twenty-three patients were included and underwent PLR test. Of these, 22 patients received FC and 14 were treated with NE. The median age was 62 years (interquartile range = 57–68.5 years), and 78% were male. PLR test led to a low CA index [58% (44–76.3%)]. FC and NE administration resulted in a CA index of 90.8% (74.2–100%) and 100% (100–100%), respectively. After PLR test, nICP based on pulsatility index and nICP based on flow velocity diastolic formula was increased [18.6 (17.7–19.6) vs. 19.3 (18.2–19.8) mm Hg, p = 0.009, and 12.9 (8.5–18) vs. 15 (10.5–19.7) mm Hg, p = 0.001, respectively]. PLR test, FC, and NE resulted in a significant increase in MAP and rSo2.Conclusions: In mechanically ventilated severe COVID-19 patients, PLR test adversely affects CA. An individualized strategy aimed at assessing both the hemodynamic and cerebral needs is warranted in patients at high risk of neurological complications.

Keywords