PLoS ONE (Jan 2017)

Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: A comparative study of different driver age groups.

  • Jesse Michaels,
  • Romain Chaumillon,
  • David Nguyen-Tri,
  • Donald Watanabe,
  • Pierro Hirsch,
  • Francois Bellavance,
  • Guillaume Giraudet,
  • Delphine Bernardin,
  • Jocelyn Faubert

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185909
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 10
p. e0185909

Abstract

Read online

To investigate the links between mental workload, age and risky driving, a cross-sectional study was conducted on a driving simulator using several established and some novel measures of driving ability and scenarios of varying complexity. A sample of 115 drivers was divided into three age and experience groups: young inexperienced (18-21 years old), adult experienced (25-55 years old) and older adult (70-86 years old). Participants were tested on three different scenarios varying in mental workload from low to high. Additionally, to gain a better understanding of individuals' ability to capture and integrate relevant information in a highly complex visual environment, the participants' perceptual-cognitive capacity was evaluated using 3-dimensional multiple object tracking (3D-MOT). Results indicate moderate scenario complexity as the best suited to highlight well-documented differences in driving ability between age groups and to elicit naturalistic driving behavior. Furthermore, several of the novel driving measures were shown to provide useful, non-redundant information about driving behavior, complementing more established measures. Finally, 3D-MOT was demonstrated to be an effective predictor of elevated crash risk as well as decreased naturally-adopted mean driving speed, particularly among older adults. In sum, the present experiment demonstrates that in cases of either extreme high or low task demands, drivers can become overloaded or under aroused and thus task measures may lose sensitivity. Moreover, insights from the present study should inform methodological considerations for future driving simulator research. Importantly, future research should continue to investigate the predictive utility of perceptual-cognitive tests in the domain of driving risk assessment.