FME Transactions (Jan 2023)

Modeling and performance analysis of FOPID controller for interacting coupled tank system

  • Ramesh Thelkar Amruth,
  • Bharatiraja C.,
  • Teka Muluken,
  • Gonfa Mulugeta,
  • Shoga Tesfabirhan,
  • Feyo Abu,
  • Mekonnen Tefera

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5937/fme2303362T
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 51, no. 3
pp. 362 – 373

Abstract

Read online

Process control is fundamental in modern interaction since it ensures security and improvement in a cycle. Furthermore, process control is a valuable apparatus to fulfill the ecological strategy and item quality necessities. In ventures, one of the controlling system factors is fluid level, the fluid level regulators are a critical concern and well-known interaction, and the aggregate illustrative additionally genuine world in designing techniques. Fluid-level coupled tank framework can be set up into two popular types of interfacing and non-associating structure. This work centers around associating coupled tank control frameworks, numerous issues impacting the fluid level like nonlinearity of the framework, displaying vulnerabilities, and complex investigation, so to conquer those issues, to acquire steady stable results and quick reactions different regulators are required. The liquid must be transferred and kept in a holder for control design in the modern day. The study of a partial request proportional-integralderivative (PID) regulator for controlling a fluid level of the tank framework is presented in this work. FOPID and TID controller techniques are tested and demonstrated for coupling connected tank systems using several partial request regulators, including Commande Robuste d'Ordre Non-Entire (CRONE), Tilt-Integral Derivative (TID), and Fractional order PID (FOPID). The result reaction is directed with the MATLAB®/Simulink® circumstance to check the exhibition of the framework. The reproduction results showed that by controlling connecting coupled tank system (CTS) without aggravation, the reaction is great, however remembering outside unsettling influence for the subsequent tank, the regulator shows a feeble reaction aside from the FOPID regulator. The explanation is FOPID regulator has at least two changed boundaries that expand the vigor of the framework. From the regulators tried in this work, the partial request relative basic subordinate regulator (FOPID) has great execution contrasted with PID, TID, and digital-PID regulators. The accomplished presentation particularly of the FOPID regulator is a better performance for CTS compared to the other listed controllers.

Keywords