Comparing Adherence with Best Practices in End-of-Life Care After Implementing the End-of-Life Order Set: A Quality Improvement Project in an Ottawa Academic Hospital

Abstract

Background: Physicians in acute care require tools to assist them in transitioning patients from a ?life prolonging? approach to ?end-of-life care,? and standardized order sets can be a useful strategy. The end-of-life order set (EOLOS) was developed and implemented in the medical wards of a community academic hospital. Objective: To compare adherence with best practices in end-of-life care after implementing the EOLOS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of admitted patients with expected deaths in the year preceding EOLOS implementation (?before EOLOS? group), and in the 12 to 24 months following EOLOS implementation (?after EOLOS? group). Results: A total of 295 charts were included: 139 (47%) in the ?before EOLOS? group and 156 (53%) in the ?after EOLOS? group, of which 117/156 charts (75%) had a completed EOLOS. The ?after EOLOS? group demonstrated more ?do not resuscitate? orders and more written communication to team members about comfort goals of care. There was a decrease in nonbeneficial interventions in the last 24 hours of life in the ?after EOLOS? group: high-flow oxygen, intravenous antibiotics, and deep vein thrombosis/venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. The ?after EOLOS? group demonstrated increased prescription of all common end-of-life medications, except for opioids, which had a high preexisting rate of prescription. Patients in the ?after EOLOS? group showed a higher rate of spiritual care and palliative care consult team consultation. Conclusion: Findings support standardized order sets as a good framework allowing generalist hospital staff to improve adherence to established palliative care principles and improve end-of-life care of hospital inpatients.

Keywords

• comfort measures
• end of life
• order set
• palliative care