Frontiers in Pharmacology (Oct 2021)

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy Between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Xiangkai Zhao,
  • Xiangkai Zhao,
  • Xiangkai Zhao,
  • Xiangkai Zhao,
  • Xiangkai Zhao,
  • Jian Zhang,
  • Jian Zhang,
  • Jian Zhang,
  • Jian Zhang,
  • Jian Zhang,
  • Jialin Guo,
  • Jialin Guo,
  • Jialin Guo,
  • Jialin Guo,
  • Jialin Guo,
  • Jinxin Wang,
  • Jinxin Wang,
  • Jinxin Wang,
  • Jinxin Wang,
  • Jinxin Wang,
  • Yuhui Pan,
  • Yuhui Pan,
  • Yuhui Pan,
  • Yuhui Pan,
  • Yuhui Pan,
  • Xue Zhao,
  • Xue Zhao,
  • Xue Zhao,
  • Xue Zhao,
  • Xue Zhao,
  • Wentao Sang,
  • Wentao Sang,
  • Wentao Sang,
  • Wentao Sang,
  • Wentao Sang,
  • Kehui Yang,
  • Kehui Yang,
  • Kehui Yang,
  • Kehui Yang,
  • Kehui Yang,
  • Fengyang Xu,
  • Fengyang Xu,
  • Fengyang Xu,
  • Fengyang Xu,
  • Fengyang Xu,
  • Feng Xu,
  • Feng Xu,
  • Feng Xu,
  • Feng Xu,
  • Feng Xu,
  • Yuguo Chen,
  • Yuguo Chen,
  • Yuguo Chen,
  • Yuguo Chen,
  • Yuguo Chen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.743259
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy combining aspirin with a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor is a therapeutic mainstay for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the optimal choice of P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor in elderly (aged ≥65 years) patients remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in elderly patients with ACS. Methods: We comprehensively searched in Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases through 29th March, 2021 for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor or clopidogrel plus aspirin in elderly patients with ACS. Four studies were included in the final analysis. A fixed effects model or random effects model was applied to analyze risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) across studies, and I2 to assess heterogeneity.Results: A total number of 4429 elderly patients with ACS were included in this analysis, of whom 2170 (49.0%) patients received aspirin plus ticagrelor and 2259 (51.0%) received aspirin plus clopidogrel. The ticagrelor group showed a significant advantage over the clopidogrel group concerning all-cause mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63–0.96, I2 = 0%; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.95, I2 = 0%) and cardiovascular death (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56–0.91, I2 = 0%; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.94, I2 = 5%) but owned a higher risk of PLATO major or minor bleeding (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.13–1.89, I2 = 0%; RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.11–1.76, I2 = 0%). Both the groups showed no significant difference regarding major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.68–1.65, I2 = 77%; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69–1.58, I2 = 77%).Conclusion: For elderly ACS patients, aspirin plus ticagrelor reduces cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality but increases the risk of bleeding. Herein, aspirin plus ticagrelor may extend lifetime for elderly ACS patients compared with aspirin plus clopidogrel. The optimal DAPT for elderly ACS patients may be a valuable direction for future research studies.

Keywords