Ecological Processes (Sep 2024)

Strong conservatism in leaf anatomical traits and their multidimensional relationships with leaf economic traits in grasslands under different stressful environments

  • Xinrui Liu,
  • Xue Wang,
  • Jiang Zhu,
  • Xiaochun Wang,
  • Kaixi Chen,
  • Yanqi Yuan,
  • Xue Yang,
  • Weiyi Mo,
  • Ruili Wang,
  • Shuoxin Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-024-00548-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Plant traits and plant adaptive strategies have been affected by the increasing intensity and severity of environmental changes. Given the uncertainty surrounding future environmental conditions, investigating plant trait variations under various stresses is crucial for unraveling plant survival strategies. Leaf anatomical traits are closely responsible for plants’ photosynthesis, respiration and transpiration. However, knowledge of how the multi-species leaf anatomical traits varied in extremely and moderately stressful environments is limited. Our objective was to compare the variation of leaf anatomic traits and adaptation strategies in two different stressful regions of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (TP) and Mongolian Plateau (MP) of China. Methods We sampled ten sites in each of the two regions (MP and TP) along an environmental gradient. Seven leaf anatomical traits and two leaf economic traits were measured for all leaf samples. Leaf anatomical traits include the traits related to leaf physiological processes (mesophyll thickness (MT), palisade tissue thickness (PT), spongy tissue thickness (ST), palisade-spongy tissue thickness ratio (PST) and epidermal thickness (ET)) and the traits related to trait construction investment (epiderm-leaf thickness ratio (ET/LT) and mesophyll-leaf thickness ratio (MT/LT)). Leaf economic traits include specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf nitrogen content (LN). Results The results revealed that leaf anatomical traits in the TP exhibited greater phylogenetic conservation with thicker structures, being less susceptible to environmental impacts than those in the MP. Additionally, the leaf anatomical and economic traits decoupled both in the MP and TP. Conclusion These findings highlight that plants adopt diverse strategies to cope with extremely and moderately environmental stresses, but multidimensional trait patterns are generally favored in stressful environments.

Keywords