Effectiveness of switching endoscopists for repeat surveillance colonoscopy: a retrospective study

Abstract

Abstract Background Surveillance colonoscopy decreases colorectal cancer mortality; however, lesions are occasionally missed. Although an appropriate surveillance interval is indicated, variations may occur in the methods used, such as scope manipulation or observation. Therefore, individual endoscopists may miss certain areas. This study aimed to verify the effectiveness of performing repeat colonoscopies with a different endoscopist from the initial procedure. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a database of 8093 consecutive colonoscopies performed in the Omori Red Cross Hospital from January 1st 2018 to June 30th 2021. Data from repeat total colonoscopies performed within three months were collected to assess missed lesions. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether the two examinations were performed by different endoscopists (group D) or the same endoscopist (group S). The primary outcome in both groups was the missed lesion detection rate (MLDR). Results Overall, 205 eligible patients were analyzed. In total, 102 and 103 patients were enrolled in groups D and S, respectively. The MLDR was significantly higher in group D (61.8% vs. 31.1%, P 6 min) (odds ratio, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.12–8.61) as significant variables. Conclusions Overall, our study showed a significant improvement in the detection of missed lesions when performed by different endoscopists. When performing repeat colonoscopy, it is desirable that a different endoscopist perform the second colonoscopy. Trial registration This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Omori Red Cross Hospital on November 28, 2022 (approval number:22–43).

Keywords

• Colorectal neoplasia
• Polyp detection
• Surveillance colonoscopy
• Adenoma detection rate