Validity and Reliability Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Heart Failure-Specific Health Literacy Scale

Abstract

Background: Health literacy (HL) has important implications for health outcomes in heart failure(HF) patients. Studying health literacy requires culturally appropriate and valid instruments. The aimof the study was validation of the Persian version of the heart failure-specific health literacy scale(HF-Specific HL Scale).Methods: One hundred patients with heart failure were selected in Qom, Iran in 2017. The ‘forwardbackward’ procedure was applied to translate the questionnaire from English into Persian. Contentvalidity, face validity, construct validity have been employed to validate the prepared scale. Cronbach’salpha coefficients and the test-retest were used to assess the scale reliability. Data were analyzed usingSPSS, version 16, and Smart PLS 3.0 software.Results: Confirmatory factor analysis completely supported the three-factor model of the HL scales.Convergent validity was satisfied in that all factor loadings and the average variance extractedexceeded 0.5. The divergent validity was verified using Fornel and Larcker method. R-square andpath coefficient were higher than 0.43 and 0.65 respectively, indicating the good structural model.Composite reliability and Cronbach’s α coefficient for all of the constructs were over the recommendedthreshold of 0.70, ensuring adequate internal consistency of the scale. The test-retest reliability rangedfrom 0.78-0.90, which indicated a good level of stability.Conclusion: The findings indicated that the Persian HF-specific HL scale is reliable and valid formeasuring health literacy among heart failure patients. Further research is required to measure thesensitivity and specificity of the scale.

Keywords

• Health Literacy
• Heart Failure
• reliability
• Validity