Materials (Sep 2024)

Enhanced Water Resistance of TiO<sub>2</sub>–GO–SMS-Modified Soil Composite for Use as a Repair Material in Earthen Sites

  • Wei Li,
  • Wenbo Bao,
  • Zhiqiang Huang,
  • Yike Li,
  • Yuxuan Guo,
  • Ming Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17184610
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 18
p. 4610

Abstract

Read online

Most earthen sites are located in open environments eroded by wind and rain, resulting in spalling and cracking caused by shrinkage due to constant water absorption and loss. Together, these issues seriously affect the stability of such sites. Gypsum–lime-modified soil offers relatively strong mechanical properties but poor water resistance. If such soil becomes damp or immersed in water, its strength is significantly reduced, making it unviable for use as a material in the preparation of earthen sites. In this study, we achieved the composite addition of a certain amount of sodium methyl silicate (SMS), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and graphene oxide (GO) into gypsum–lime-modified soil and analyzed the microstructural evolution of the composite-modified soil using characterization methods such as XRD, SEM, and EDS. A comparative study was conducted on changes in the mechanical properties of the composite-modified soil and original soil before and after immersion using water erosion, unconfined compression (UCS), and unconsolidated undrained (UU) triaxial compression tests. These analyses revealed the micro-mechanisms for improving the waterproof performance of the composite-modified soil. The results showed that the addition of SMS, TiO2, and GO did not change the crystal structure or composition of the original soil. In addition, TiO2 and GO were evenly distributed between the modified soil particles, playing a positive role in filling and stabilizing the structure of the modified soil. After being immersed in water for one hour, the original soil experienced structural instability leading to collapse. While the water absorption rate of the composite-modified soil was only 0.84%, its unconfined compressive strength was 4.88 MPa (the strength retention rate before and after immersion was as high as 93.1%), and the shear strength was 614 kPa (the strength retention rate before and after immersion was as high as 96.7%).

Keywords