Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (Oct 2023)

Outcome of severely injured patients in a unique trauma system with 24/7 double trauma surgeon on-call service

  • Karlijn J. P. van Wessem,
  • Luke P. H. Leenen,
  • R. Marijn Houwert,
  • Kim E. M. Benders,
  • Roger K. J. Simmermacher,
  • Mark C. P. M. van Baal,
  • Ivar G. J. M. de Bruin,
  • Mirjam B. de Jong,
  • Stefaan J. B. Nijs,
  • Falco Hietbrink

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01122-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 31, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The presence of in-house attending trauma surgeons has improved efficiency of processes in the treatment of polytrauma patients. However, literature remains equivocal regarding the influence of the presence of in-house attendings on mortality. In our hospital there is a double trauma surgeon on-call system. In this system an in-house trauma surgeon is 24/7 backed up by a second trauma surgeon to assist with urgent surgery or multiple casualties. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome in severely injured patients in this unique trauma system. Methods From 2014 to 2021, a prospective population-based cohort consisting of consecutive polytrauma patients aged ≥ 15 years requiring both urgent surgery (≤ 24h) and admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) was investigated. Demographics, treatment, outcome parameters and pre- and in-hospital transfer times were analyzed. Results Three hundred thirteen patients with a median age of 44 years (71% male), and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 33 were included. Mortality rate was 19% (68% due to traumatic brain injury). All patients stayed ≤ 32 min in ED before transport to either CT or OR. Fifty-one percent of patients who needed damage control surgery (DCS) had a more deranged physiology, needed more blood products, were more quickly in OR with shorter time in OR, than patients with early definitive care (EDC). There was no difference in mortality rate between DCS and EDC patients. Fifty-six percent of patients had surgery during off-hours. There was no difference in outcome between patients who had surgery during daytime and during off-hours. Death could possibly have been prevented in 1 exsanguinating patient (1.7%). Conclusion In this cohort of severely injured patients in need of urgent surgery and ICU support it was demonstrated that surgical decision making was swift and accurate with low preventable death rates. 24/7 Physical presence of a dedicated trauma team has likely contributed to these good outcomes.

Keywords