BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review (Jan 2003)

Repliek

  • H. te Velde

DOI
https://doi.org/10.18352/bmgn-lchr.5837
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 118, no. 2
pp. 217 – 221

Abstract

Read online

Response, Henk te VeldeDuring my research I have greatly benefited from the historiography of political parties and I agree with Bosmans that the relatively new approach of political culture should collaborate with classic political history. However, I am more interested in similarities between different political currents and how they compare with the international scene. Another area of particular interest for me is the public aspect of political leadership and how this relates to the time in which it takes place. The issue is, therefore, not the party political aspects of Colijn's leadership but rather the praise he received at that time from outside his own party. The most prominent political leaders were not modest administrators but 'partisan', controversial members of the best-organised and strongest parties, such as the orthodox Protestant ARP. Among many other things, I analyse the relevance of clichés about 'Calvinist' and 'religious' politics with regard to the public appeal of ex-orthodox Protestant Den Uyl. Unfortunately, however, Van Deursen seems to believe, unjustly, that I am expressing my own personal opinion on Calvinism. This response is part of the discussion forum 'Stijlen van leiderschap' (H. te Velde).

Keywords