Frontiers in Oncology (Nov 2019)

Different Pathological Complete Response Rates According to PAM50 Subtype in HER2+ Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Pertuzumab/Trastuzumab vs. Trastuzumab Plus Standard Chemotherapy: An Analysis of Real-World Data

  • Tamara Díaz-Redondo,
  • Tamara Díaz-Redondo,
  • Rocio Lavado-Valenzuela,
  • Rocio Lavado-Valenzuela,
  • Begoña Jimenez,
  • Begoña Jimenez,
  • Tomas Pascual,
  • Fernando Gálvez,
  • Alejandro Falcón,
  • Maria del Carmen Alamo,
  • Cristina Morales,
  • Marta Amerigo,
  • Javier Pascual,
  • Alfonso Sanchez-Muñoz,
  • Alfonso Sanchez-Muñoz,
  • Macarena González-Guerrero,
  • Luis Vicioso,
  • Luis Vicioso,
  • Aurora Laborda,
  • Maria Victoria Ortega,
  • Maria Victoria Ortega,
  • Lidia Perez,
  • Lidia Perez,
  • Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez,
  • Nuria Chic,
  • Jose Manuel Jerez,
  • Jose Manuel Jerez,
  • Martina Alvarez,
  • Martina Alvarez,
  • Martina Alvarez,
  • Aleix Prat,
  • Nuria Ribelles,
  • Nuria Ribelles,
  • Emilio Alba,
  • Emilio Alba,
  • Emilio Alba

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01178
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

Background: Double blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is the standard neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive early breast cancer. Data derived from clinical trials indicates that the response rates differ among intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer. The aim of this study is to determine if these results are valid in real-world patients.Methods: A total of 259 patients treated in eight Spanish hospitals were included and divided into two cohorts: Cohort A (132 patients) received trastuzumab plus standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and Cohort B received pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus NAC (122 patients). Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as the complete disappearance of invasive tumor cells. Assignment of the intrinsic subtype was realized using the research-based PAM50 signature.Results: There were more HER2-enriched tumors in Cohort A (70 vs. 56%) and more basal-like tumors in Cohort B (12 vs. 2%), with similar luminal cases in both cohorts (luminal A 12 vs. 14%; luminal B 14 vs. 18%). The overall pCR rate was 39% in Cohort A and 61% in Cohort B. Better pCR rates with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab than with trastuzumab alone were also observed in all intrinsic subtypes (luminal PAM50 41 vs. 11.4% and HER2-enriched subtype 73.5 vs. 50%) but not in basal-like tumors (53.3 vs. 50%). In multivariate analysis the only significant variables related to pCR in both luminal PAM50 and HER2-enriched subtypes were treatment with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (Cohort B) and histological grade 3.Conclusions: With data obtained from patients treated in clinical practice, it has been possible to verify that the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy substantially increases the rate of pCR, especially in the HER2-enriched subtype but also in luminal subtypes, with no apparent benefit in basal-like tumors.

Keywords