JBJS Open Access (Jun 2024)

Education Forum: Restrictive Covenants (Non-competes) in Orthopaedic Fellowships: What Every Resident Should Know Before Applying to Fellowship

  • Joshua W. Hustedt, MD, MHS,
  • Mark J. Spangehl, MD, FAOA

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00167
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

Introduction:. More than 90% of orthopaedic surgery residents in the United States complete a fellowship program. While there is significant oversight of the educational process and rights of residents during residency, there is little standardization in fellowships in the United States. Applicants to fellowship need to be aware that they may be required to sign restrictive covenants (“non-competes”) as part of the fellowship application or acceptance process. These restrictive covenants may be designed to protect the business interests of the host institution but may affect the fellow's ability to obtain employment in a geographic region. Methods:. A review of society websites designed to education fellowship applicants was reviewed. Information was gathered on whether the society provided information on restrictive covenants in fellowship programs. Results:. There is little standardization of restrictive covenants in orthopedic fellowships in the United States. Only accredited fellowships prohibit restrictive covenants in orthopedic fellowships. Pediatrics is the only sub-specialty society that provides information to applicants on restrictive covenants for fellowship applicants. Conclusion:. The current lack of standardization in the fellowship process means applicants need to be well versed in these restrictive covenants before applying. In turn, fellowships themselves, as well as subspecialty societies, should seek to be transparent in providing information on restrictive covenant requirements of their respective fellowships.