mSphere (Dec 2023)

Comparative efficacy of vancomycin in treating ST5 and ST764 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adult patients

  • Yaxin Fan,
  • Kaiting Zhang,
  • Mengting Chen,
  • Nanyang Li,
  • Xiaofen Liu,
  • Minjie Yang,
  • Xiaoyu Liang,
  • Jufang Wu,
  • Beining Guo,
  • Huajun Zheng,
  • Yongqiang Zhu,
  • Fengying Zhang,
  • Jingqing Hang,
  • Huifang Zhang,
  • Ruilan Wang,
  • Qing Yuan,
  • Xiaolian Song,
  • Shengbin Wu,
  • Bo Shen,
  • Jing Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00457-23
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 6

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACTThis study compared the impact of sequence type 5 (ST5) and ST764, on the efficacy of vancomycin treatment in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. From July 2012 to June 2020, a prospective observational study was conducted in five hospitals in China, enrolling 90 patients with MRSA infections, including 44 patients with ST5-MRSA and 46 patients with ST764-MRSA infections. All strains were subjected to minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination, biofilm expression, heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) screening, and whole-genome sequencing. Vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring was conducted, and the 24-hour area under the curve (AUC0-24) and AUC0-24/MIC values were calculated. ST5-MRSA shows elevated hVISA/VISA presence, increased biofilm formation, and higher presence of virulence genes like tst, sec, and sel. ST764-MRSA expresses seb, aiding infection in elderly patients in the community. Additionally, patients with ST764 infections exhibit higher vancomycin AUC0-24/MIC values, and fewer tracheotomies compared to ST5. Clinical signs and symptoms improvement were observed in 27 (61.4%) and 33 (71.7%) patients in the ST5 and ST764 groups, respectively (P = 0.372). On the other hand, 28 (63.6%) and 39 (84.8%) patients had laboratory-confirmed bacterial eradication in two groups, respectively (P = 0.029). Multivariate analysis showed that the virulence genes, such as the tst gene, were a risk factor for bacterial persistence (adjusted odds ratio, 4.509; 95% confidence interval, 1.216 to 16.724; P = 0.024). Our study showed that vancomycin was less effective in treating ST5-MRSA infection compared to ST764-MRSA infection, in part because ST5-MRSA is healthcare-associated MRSA while ST764-MRSA carries genetic characteristics of community-associated MRSA.IMPORTANCEMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a bacterium that is resistant to multiple drugs and can cause serious infections. In recent years, one of the most widespread strains of MRSA worldwide has been the clonal complex 5 (CC5) type. Sequence type 5 (ST5) and ST764 are two prevalent CC5 strains. Although ST5 and ST764 are genotypically identical, ST764 is classified as a hybrid variant of ST5 with characteristics of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA). In contrast to ST5, ST764 lacks the tst and sec genes but carries the staphylococcal enterotoxin B (seb) gene. Vancomycin is commonly used as the first-line treatment for MRSA infections. However, it is currently unclear whether the genetic differences between the ST5 and ST764 strains have any impact on the efficacy of vancomycin in treating MRSA infections. We conducted a prospective observational study comparing the efficacy of vancomycin against ST5-MRSA and ST764-MRSA in five hospitals in China. There were significant differences in bacteriological efficacy between the two groups, with virulence genes, such as the tst gene, being a risk factor for bacterial persistence (adjusted odds ratio, 4.509; 95% confidence interval, 1.216 to 16.724; P = 0.024). In the future, it may be necessary to consider personalized vancomycin treatment strategies based on the genetic characteristics of MRSA isolates.

Keywords