PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Dog-bite injuries in Korea and risk factors for significant dog-bite injuries: A 6-year cross-sectional study.

  • Joong Wan Park,
  • Do Kyun Kim,
  • Jae Yun Jung,
  • Se Uk Lee,
  • Ikwan Chang,
  • Young Ho Kwak,
  • Soyun Hwang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210541
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 2
p. e0210541

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionAn accurate understanding of the current status of dog-bite injuries in Korea is essential for establishing preventive strategies. There have been no national reports about dog-bite injuries in Korea. This study investigated dog-bite injuries in Korea that were registered in the nationwide injury surveillance database and analysed the risk factors for significant dog-bite injury.MethodsA multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted using the emergency department (ED)-based Injury In-depth Surveillance (EDIIS) registry in Korea between 2011 and 2016. We defined significant injury as death, admission, surgery, or fracture or amputation. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to obtain the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for the factors associated with significant dog-bite injuries.ResultsAmong 1,537,617 injured patients, 9,966 (6.5 per 1,000 injured patients) presented to the ED for dog-bite injuries (5.6 in 2011 to 7.6 in 2016, P for trend 18 years). Being elderly (≥ 60 years) (aOR: 2.70, 95% CI: 2.15-3.39), having injuries to multiple anatomic sites (aOR: 4.37, 95% CI: 2.96-6.45), being bitten outdoors (aOR: 2.71, 95% CI: 2.20-3.34), and being bitten by a relative's dog (aOR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.09-5.17) were strongly associated with significant dog-bite injury.ConclusionDog-bite injuries are increasing in Korea, especially in teenagers and adults. A relative's or neighbour's dog may be more dangerous than a stranger's dog. Preventive strategies are needed to prevent dog-bite injuries in adults and children.