Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica (Apr 2024)

Evaluation of Brazilian women’s participation in the CNPQ in the field of medical research

  • Gabriele Martins Keffer,
  • Árlen Almeida Duarte de Sousa,
  • Fabrício Emanuel Oliveira,
  • Marcelo José da Silva Magalhães,
  • Eduardo Araújo Oliveira,
  • Hercílio Martelli Júnior

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v48.2-2023-0271.ing
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 48, no. 2

Abstract

Read online Read online

Abstract Introduction: Brazilian scientific production has shown substantial growth and achieved international visibility. However, in general, the participation of women in scientific activities remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the indicators of scientific productivity of women fellows of the Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) in the field of Medicine. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 541 (211 women, 39%) researchers registered as recipients of CNPq research productivity (PQ) scholarships in Medicine according to a list provided in December 2022. Results: There was a predominance of male researchers (n=330; 61%). In both the male and female groups, most researchers were at level 2, with 62.5% women and 47.2% men (p=0.018). All 211 female PQ scholars were distributed among 37 different institutions and published 34,969 papers in scientific journals, averaging 165.7 articles per researcher. In the last five years of the study period (from 2018 to 2022), 9,679 papers were published. Over their careers, the 211 researchers supervised 5,440 undergraduate research students, 4,144 master’s degree students, and 2,923 PhD candidates. There was a significant difference between the scholarship levels for the development of human resources in undergraduate research (p=0.040), master’s degree (p=0.027), and PhD. (p<0.001). Conclusion: There are still less women participating in CNPq medical research than men. However, we observed a substantial participation of women in all the assessed items, including technical and scientific production and the human resources training.

Keywords