PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

A pilot randomized controlled trial of group-based indoor gardening and art activities demonstrates therapeutic benefits to healthy women.

  • Raymond Odeh,
  • Elizabeth R M Diehl,
  • Sara Jo Nixon,
  • C Craig Tisher,
  • Dylan Klempner,
  • Jill K Sonke,
  • Thomas A Colquhoun,
  • Qian Li,
  • Maria Espinosa,
  • Dianela Perdomo,
  • Kaylee Rosario,
  • Hannah Terzi,
  • Charles L Guy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269248
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 7
p. e0269248

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThere is mounting anecdotal and empirical evidence that gardening and art-making afford therapeutic benefits.ObjectivesThis randomly controlled pilot study tested the hypothesis that participation in group-based indoor gardening or art-making activities for one hour twice a week for four weeks would provide quantifiably different therapeutic benefits to a population of healthy women ages 26-49.MethodsA population of 42 volunteers was randomly assigned to parallel gardening or art-making treatment groups. A total of 36 participants initiated the treatment protocol and 32 (Gardening n = 15 and Art n = 17) received the interventions and completed all assessments. Treatments included eight one-hour group-based gardening or art intervention sessions. Self-report psychometric assessments were conducted for anxiety, depression symptomatology, mood disturbance, stress, satisfaction with discretionary social activities, and quality of life measures. Cardiac physiological data were also collected. Outcomes were measured at baseline, during, and post-intervention.ResultsEngaging in both gardening and art-making activities resulted in apparent therapeutic improvements for self-reported total mood disturbance, depression symptomatology, and perceived stress with different effect sizes following eight one-hour treatment sessions. Gardening also resulted in improvements for indications of trait anxiety. Based on time-course evidence, dosage responses were observed for total mood disturbance, perceived stress, and depression symptomatology for both gardening and art-making. However, gardening or art-making did not have an apparent influence on heart rate or blood pressure or result in marked improvement for satisfaction with discretionary leisure activities.ConclusionThe data did not support the hypothesis of differential therapeutic benefits of gardening and art-making for healthy women. When taken together, group-based gardening or art-making can provide quantitatively measurable improvements in healthy women's psychosocial health status that imply potentially important public health benefits.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03266120.