The Lancet Regional Health. Americas (Oct 2021)

Factors Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Bogotá, Colombia: Results From a Large Epidemiological Surveillance Study

  • Andrea Ramirez Varela,
  • Luis Jorge Hernandez Florez,
  • Guillermo Tamayo-Cabeza,
  • Sandra Contreras-Arrieta,
  • Silvia Restrepo Restrepo,
  • Rachid Laajaj,
  • Giancarlo Buitrago Gutierrez,
  • Yenny Paola Rueda Guevara,
  • Yuldor Caballero-Díaz,
  • Martha Vives Florez,
  • Elkin Osorio,
  • Ignacio Sarmiento Barbieri,
  • Daniela Rodriguez Sanchez,
  • Leonardo Leon Nuñez,
  • Raquel Bernal,
  • Sofía Rios Oliveros,
  • Leonardo Salas Zapata,
  • Marcela Guevara-Suarez,
  • Alejandro Gaviria Uribe,
  • Eduardo Behrentz, on behalf of the CoVIDA working group

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2
p. 100048

Abstract

Read online

Background: Epidemiologic surveillance of COVID-19 is essential to collect and analyse data to improve public health decision making during the pandemic. There are few initiatives led by public-private alliances in Colombia and Latin America. The CoVIDA project contributed with RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 in mild or asymptomatic populations in Bogotá. The present study aimed to determine the factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in working adults. Methods: COVID-19 intensified sentinel epidemiological surveillance study, from April 18, 2020, to March 29, 2021. The study included people aged 18 years or older without a history of COVID-19. Two main occupational groups were included: healthcare and essential services workers with high mobility in the city. Social, demographic, and health-related factors were collected via phone survey. Afterwards, the molecular test was conducted to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. Findings: From the 58,638 participants included in the study, 3,310 (5·6%) had a positive result. A positive result was associated with the age group (18-29 years) compared with participants aged 60 or older, participants living with more than three cohabitants, living with a confirmed case, having no affiliation to the health system compared to those with social health security, reporting a very low socioeconomic status compared to those with higher socioeconomic status, and having essential occupations compared to healthcare workers. Interpretation: The CoVIDA study showed the importance of intensified epidemiological surveillance to identify groups with increased risk of infection. These groups should be prioritised in the screening, contact tracing, and vaccination strategies to mitigate the pandemic. Funding: The CoVIDA study was funded through donors managed by the philanthropy department of Universidad de los Andes.

Keywords