Scientific Reports (Mar 2023)

Cost consequence analysis of waiting for lumbar disc herniation surgery

  • Charlotte Dandurand,
  • Mohammad Sadegh Mashayekhi,
  • Greg McIntosh,
  • Supriya Singh,
  • Jerome Paquet,
  • Hasaan Chaudhry,
  • Edward Abraham,
  • Christopher S. Bailey,
  • Michael H. Weber,
  • Michael G. Johnson,
  • Andrew Nataraj,
  • Najmedden Attabib,
  • Adrienne Kelly,
  • Hamilton Hall,
  • Y. Raja Rampersaud,
  • Neil Manson,
  • Philippe Phan,
  • Ken Thomas,
  • Charles Fisher,
  • Raphaele Charest-Morin,
  • Alex Soroceanu,
  • Bernard LaRue,
  • Nicolas Dea

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31029-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract The economic repercussions of waiting for lumbar disc surgery have not been well studied. The primary goal of this study was to perform a cost-consequence analysis of patients receiving early vs late surgery for symptomatic disc herniation from a societal perspective. Secondarily, we compared patient factors and patient-reported outcomes. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the CSORN registry. A cost-consequence analysis was performed where direct and indirect costs were compared, and different outcomes were listed separately. Comparisons were made on an observational cohort of patients receiving surgery less than 60 days after consent (short wait) or 60 days or more after consent (long wait). This study included 493 patients with surgery between January 2015 and October 2021 with 272 patients (55.2%) in the short wait group and 221 patients (44.8%) classified as long wait. There was no difference in proportions of patients who returned to work at 3 and 12-months. Time from surgery to return to work was similar between both groups (34.0 vs 34.9 days, p = 0.804). Time from consent to return to work was longer in the longer wait group corresponding to an additional $11,753.10 mean indirect cost per patient. The short wait group showed increased healthcare usage at 3 months with more emergency department visits (52.6% vs 25.0%, p < 0.032), more physiotherapy (84.6% vs 72.0%, p < 0.001) and more MRI (65.2% vs 41.4%, p < 0.043). This corresponded to an additional direct cost of $518.21 per patient. Secondarily, the short wait group had higher baseline NRS leg, ODI, and lower EQ5D and PCS. The long wait group had more patients with symptoms over 2 years duration (57.6% vs 34.1%, p < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients reached MCID in terms of NRS leg pain at 3-month follow up in the short wait group (84.0% vs 75.9%, p < 0.040). This cost-consequence analysis of an observational cohort showed decreased costs associated with early surgery of $11,234.89 per patient when compared to late surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The early surgery group had more severe symptoms with higher healthcare utilization. This is counterbalanced by the additional productivity loss in the long wait group, which likely have a more chronic disease. From a societal economic perspective, early surgery seems beneficial and should be promoted.