BMC Medicine (May 2022)

Subsequent treatments beyond progression on osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and leptomeningeal metastases

  • Mei-Mei Zheng,
  • Yang-Si Li,
  • Hai-Yan Tu,
  • Hao Sun,
  • Kai Yin,
  • Ben-Yuan Jiang,
  • Jin-Ji Yang,
  • Xu-Chao Zhang,
  • Qing Zhou,
  • Chong-Rui Xu,
  • Zhen Wang,
  • Hua-Jun Chen,
  • De-Xiang Zhou,
  • Yi-Long Wu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02387-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Despite the reported efficacy of osimertinib, central nervous system (CNS) progression is still frequent in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This study aimed to reveal site-specific resistant mechanisms to osimertinib and investigate subsequent treatments for leptomeningeal metastases (LM). Methods EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM who progressed on osimertinib were included. Molecular analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at osimertinib progression was performed. Subsequent treatments of LM were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 246 patients were identified. Only those with LM as a progression site on osimertinib were included (n=81). In 58 CSF-plasma pairs, more alterations were uniquely detected in CSF (77%) than in plasma (7%). These mechanisms led to 22 patients receiving matched targeted therapy. Among them, 16 (72.7%) had a clinical response. The median overall survival was 7.2 months. For non-matched therapy (n=59), the osimertinib combination had a longer median overall survival than the regimen switch in CNS-only progression (15.3 vs. 7 months, p=0.03). Finally, serial monitoring by CSF revealed the potential evolution of LM. Conclusions Private resistant mechanisms in CSF might match osimertinib-resistant LM for targeted therapy. Besides, continuing osimertinib with intensification strategy might prolong survival, especially for those with CNS-only progression. Prospective exploration is needed.

Keywords