Journal of Personalized Medicine (Jan 2024)

Prognostic Value of Radiomic Analysis Using Pre- and Post-Treatment <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Laryngeal Cancer and Hypopharyngeal Cancer

  • Joon Ho Choi,
  • Joon Young Choi,
  • Sang-Keun Woo,
  • Ji Eun Moon,
  • Chae Hong Lim,
  • Soo Bin Park,
  • Seongho Seo,
  • Yong Chan Ahn,
  • Myung-Ju Ahn,
  • Seung Hwan Moon,
  • Jung Mi Park

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14010071
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
p. 71

Abstract

Read online

Background: The prognostic value of conducting 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging has yielded different results in patients with laryngeal cancer and hypopharyngeal cancer, but these results are controversial, and there is a lack of dedicated studies on each type of cancer. This study aimed to evaluate whether combining radiomic analysis of pre- and post-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging features and clinical parameters has additional prognostic value in patients with laryngeal cancer and hypopharyngeal cancer. Methods: From 2008 to 2016, data on patients diagnosed with cancer of the larynx and hypopharynx were retrospectively collected. The patients underwent pre- and post-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging. The values of ΔPre-Post PET were measured from the texture features. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression was used to select the most predictive features to formulate a Rad-score for both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier curve analysis and Cox regression were employed to assess PFS and OS. Then, the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plot were used to evaluate the performance of the radiomics nomogram. Results: Study data were collected for a total of 91 patients. The mean follow-up period was 71.5 mo. (8.4–147.3). The Rad-score was formulated based on the texture parameters and was significantly associated with both PFS (p = 0.024) and OS (p = 0.009). When predicting PFS, only the Rad-score demonstrated a significant association (HR 2.1509, 95% CI [1.100–4.207], p = 0.025). On the other hand, age (HR 1.116, 95% CI [1.041–1.197], p = 0.002) and Rad-score (HR 33.885, 95% CI [2.891–397.175], p = 0.005) exhibited associations with OS. The Rad-score value showed good discrimination when it was combined with clinical parameters in both PFS (C-index 0.802–0.889) and OS (C-index 0.860–0.958). The calibration plots also showed a good agreement between the observed and predicted survival probabilities. Conclusions: Combining clinical parameters with radiomics analysis of pre- and post-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in patients with laryngeal cancer and hypopharyngeal cancer might have additional prognostic value.

Keywords