Asian Journal of Andrology (Jan 2020)

Prostate volume does not provide additional predictive value to prostate health index for prostate cancer or clinically significant prostate cancer: results from a multicenter study in China

  • Da Huang,
  • Yi-Shuo Wu,
  • Ding-Wei Ye,
  • Jun Qi,
  • Fang Liu,
  • Brian T Helfand,
  • Siqun L Zheng,
  • Qiang Ding,
  • Dan-Feng Xu,
  • Rong Na,
  • Jian-Feng Xu,
  • Ying-Hao Sun

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_136_19
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 5
pp. 539 – 543

Abstract

Read online

To evaluate whether prostate volume (PV) would provide additional predictive utility to the prostate health index (phi) for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) or clinically significant prostate cancer, we designed a prospective, observational multicenter study in two prostate biopsy cohorts. Cohort 1 included 595 patients from three medical centers from 2012 to 2013, and Cohort 2 included 1025 patients from four medical centers from 2013 to 2014. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the predictive performance of PV-based derivatives and models. Linear regression analysis showed that both total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) were significantly correlated with PV (all P 0.05). In conclusion, PV-based derivatives (both PHIV and PHID) and models incorporating PV did not improve the predictive abilities of phi for either PCa or clinically significant PCa.

Keywords