PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Comparison of oral versus intravenous methadone on postoperative pain and opioid use after adult spinal deformity surgery: A retrospective, non-inferiority analysis.

  • Kamilla Esfahani,
  • William Tennant,
  • Siny Tsang,
  • Bhiken I Naik,
  • Lauren K Dunn

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288988
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 7
p. e0288988

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveTo compare efficacy of oral versus intravenous (IV) methadone on postoperative pain and opioid requirements after spine surgery.MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-academic center cohort study evaluating 1010 patients who underwent >3 level spine surgery from January 2017 to May 2020 and received a one-time dose of oral or intravenous methadone prior to surgery. The primary outcome measured was postoperative opioid use in oral morphine equivalents (ME) and verbal response scale (VRS) pain scores up to postoperative day (POD) three. Secondary outcomes were time to first bowel movement and adverse effects (reintubation, myocardial infarction, and QTc prolongation) up to POD 3.ResultsA total of 687 patients received oral and 317 received IV methadone, six patients were excluded. The IV group received a significantly greater methadone morphine equivalent (ME) dose preoperatively (112.4 ± 83.0 mg ME versus 59.3 ± 60.9 mg ME, p ConclusionsOral methadone is a feasible alternative to IV methadone for patients undergoing spine surgery regarding both pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption.