Frontiers in Neurology (Feb 2022)

Precision Medicine in Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Home Diagnostic Testing: Caution in Interpretation of Home Studies Without Clinician Input Is Necessary

  • Timothy Quy-Phong Do,
  • Timothy Quy-Phong Do,
  • Timothy Quy-Phong Do,
  • Stuart Grayson MacKay,
  • Stuart Grayson MacKay,
  • Stuart Grayson MacKay,
  • Matthew Eugene Lam,
  • Matthew Eugene Lam,
  • Anders William Sideris,
  • Anders William Sideris,
  • Andrew Christopher Jones,
  • Andrew Christopher Jones,
  • Lyndon Sidney Chan,
  • Lyndon Sidney Chan,
  • Lyndon Sidney Chan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.825708
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

PurposeTo assess the validity of home sleep apnea test directed diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a real-life clinical setting and establish the extent to which clinical evaluation alters diagnosis and therapeutic intervention, in the context of the evolving realm of precision medicine.MethodsRetrospective consecutive cohort study of 505 patients referred to a single center between 15th September 2015 to 14th September 2016, multidisciplinary specialist sleep clinic presenting with a home sleep apnea test prior to referral. We evaluated the effect of sleep medicine practitioner (SMP) and ear, nose, and throat surgeon (ENTS) review on patient diagnoses, disease severity, and management options in OSA.ResultsHundred and fifteen patients were included. Repeat evaluation with in-lab polysomnogram (PSG) was required in 46/115 (40.0%) of patients, of which 20/46 (43.5%) had OSA severity changed. Sleep medicine practitioner review decreased the need for repeat testing with formal in-lab PSG (p < 0.05) and increased patient acceptance of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a long-term management option for OSA. Sleep medicine practitioner/ENTS review resulted in discovery of a non-OSA related sleep disorder or change in OSA severity in 47.8% (55/115). Ear, nose, and throat surgeon review resulted in additional or changed diagnosis in 75.7% (87/115) of patients.ConclusionIn the clinical assessment and diagnosis of OSA, patients should be reviewed by medical practitioners with an interest in sleep disorders to better navigate the complexities of assessment, as well as the identification of co-morbid conditions.

Keywords