Advances in Radiation Oncology (Jun 2024)

Anesthetic Oxygen Use and Sex Are Critical Factors in the FLASH Sparing Effect

  • Armin D. Tavakkoli, BA,
  • Megan A. Clark, BE,
  • Alireza Kheirollah, PhD,
  • Austin M. Sloop, MS,
  • Haille E. Soderholm, BA,
  • Noah J. Daniel, MS,
  • Arthur F. Petusseau, PhD,
  • Yina H. Huang, PhD,
  • Charles R. Thomas, Jr, MD,
  • Lesley A. Jarvis, MD, PhD,
  • Rongxiao Zhang, PhD,
  • Brian W. Pogue, PhD,
  • David J. Gladstone, ScD,
  • P. Jack Hoopes, DVM, PhD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 6
p. 101492

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: Ultra High Dose-Rate (UHDR) radiation has been reported to spare normal tissue, compared with Conventional Dose-Rate (CDR) radiation. However, important work remains to be done to improve the reproducibility of the FLASH effect. A better understanding of the biologic factors that modulate the FLASH effect may shed light on the mechanism of FLASH sparing. Here, we evaluated whether sex and/or the use of 100% oxygen as a carrier gas during irradiation contribute to the variability of the FLASH effect. Methods and Materials: C57BL/6 mice (24 male, 24 female) were anesthetized using isoflurane mixed with either room air or 100% oxygen. Subsequently, the mice received 27 Gy of either 9 MeV electron UHDR or CDR to a 1.6 cm2 diameter area of the right leg skin using the Mobetron linear accelerator. The primary postradiation endpoint was time to full thickness skin ulceration. In a separate cohort of mice (4 male, 4 female), skin oxygenation was measured using PdG4 Oxyphor under identical anesthesia conditions. Results: Neither supplemental oxygen nor sex affected time to ulceration in CDR irradiated mice. In the UHDR group, skin damage occured earlier in male and female mice that received 100% oxygen compared room air and female mice ulcerated sooner than male mice. However, there was no significant difference in time to ulceration between male and female UHDR mice that received room air. Oxygen measurements showed that tissue oxygenation was significantly higher when using 100% oxygen as the anesthesia carrier gas than when using room air, and female mice showed higher levels of tissue oxygenation than male mice under 100% oxygen. Conclusions: The skin FLASH sparing effect is significantly reduced when using oxygen during anesthesia rather than room air. FLASH sparing was also reduced in female mice compared to male mice. Both tissue oxygenation and sex are likely sources of variability in UHDR studies. These results suggest an oxygen-based mechanism for FLASH, as well as a key role for sex in the FLASH skin sparing effect.