Diagnostics (Feb 2022)

Non-Contrast-Enhanced and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Living Donor Liver Vascular Anatomy

  • Chien-Chang Liao,
  • Meng-Hsiang Chen,
  • Chun-Yen Yu,
  • Leung-Chit Leo Tsang,
  • Chao-Long Chen,
  • Hsien-Wen Hsu,
  • Wei-Xiong Lim,
  • Yi-Hsuan Chuang,
  • Po-Hsun Huang,
  • Yu-Fan Cheng,
  • Hsin-You Ou

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020498
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 2
p. 498

Abstract

Read online

Background: Since the advent of a new generation of inflow-sensitive inversion recovery (IFIR) technology, three-dimensional non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is being used to obtain hepatic vessel images without applying gadolinium contrast agent. The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic efficacy of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (non-CE MRA), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA), and computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the preoperative evaluation of living liver donors. Methods: A total of 43 liver donor candidates who were evaluated for living donor liver transplantation completed examinations. Donors’ age, gender, renal function (eGFR), and previous CTA and imaging were recorded before non-CE MRA and CMRA. CTA images were used as the standard. Results: Five different classifications of hepatic artery patterns (types I, III, V, VI, VIII) and three different classifications of portal vein patterns (types I, II, and III) were identified among 43 candidates. The pretransplant vascular anatomy was well identified using combined non-CE MRA and CMRA of hepatic arteries (100%), PVs (98%), and hepatic veins (100%) compared with CTA images. Non-CE MRA images had significantly stronger contrast signal intensity of portal veins (p p Conclusion: Combined non-CE MRA and CMRA demonstrate comparable diagnostic ability to CTA and provide enhanced biliary anatomy information that assures optimum donor safety.

Keywords