Prognostic value of liver stiffness measurement in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by radiofrequency ablation: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Background In patients with stage 0–A (as per Milan criteria) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) image-guided ablation is less invasive and requires shorter hospitalization than resection, but long-term prognosis is poorer. This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether liver stiffness measurement (LSM) could be used to predict prognosis in HCC patients after tumor ablation. Methods A literature search was conducted for all studies published till July 2020 in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and EMBASE. Studies were included if they investigated the association between pretreatment LSM and prognosis in HCC patients treated with ablation. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression, publication bias assessment and sensitivity were conducted. Results Eight studies (with a total of 1276 HCC patients) were included in this meta-analysis. All patients were treated with radiofrequency ablation. Pooled results showed that high pretreatment LSM were associated with poor overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.27–8.20, p < .001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), regardless of whether LSM was considered as a categorical variable (HR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.63–4.22, p < .001) or as a continuous variable (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01–1.04, p = .003). Among studies treating LSM value as a categorical variable, liver stiffness measured using acoustic radio force impulse (ARFI) or transient elastography (TE) was significantly associated with RFS, but not liver stiffness measured using two-dimensional shear wave elastography (SWE). Conclusions High baseline LSM value appears to be associated with poor prognosis in HCC patients treated with radiofrequency ablation.

Keywords

• hepatocellular carcinoma
• liver stiffness
• radiofrequency ablation
• meta-analysis